DRAFT
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
STATE EMPLOYEES
RETIREMENT COMMISSION
A regular meeting of the State Employees Retirement Commission (the
�Commission�) was held on February 21, 2019, in 7th Floor Conference Room at 55
Elm Street, Hartford Connecticut. The meeting convened at 9:00 a.m. and
the following members of the Commission were present:
- Peter Adomeit, Chairman
- Karen Buffkin, Trustee (via phone)
- Michael Carey, Trustee
- Charles Casella, Trustee (via phone)
- Robert D. Coffey, Trustee
- Paul Fortier, Trustee
- Ronald McLellan, Trustee
- Karen Nolen, Trustee
- Claude Poulin, Trustee
- Angel Quiros, Trustee
- Sal Luciano, Trustee
- Martha Carlson, Deputy Comptroller & Interim Director of Retirement
Services, Ex Officio Member
- Laurie Martin, Ex Officio Member
The following members of the Commission were absent:
- Michael Bailey, Trustee
- Sandra Fae Brown Brewton, Trustee
- Janet Andrews, Trustee
Also present were:
- Bruce Barth, Robinson & Cole
- Cindy Cieslak, General Counsel to the Commission Rose Kallor
- Ralph Effrid, Post Reporting
- John Herrington, Retirement Services Division
- Colin Newman, Retirement Services Division
- Rose, General Counsel to the Commission Rose Kallor
- Alisha Sullivan, Robinson & Cole
- Winona Zimberlin, counsel for Jeremy Wiganowske and William Dietrich
Call to Order
Chairman Adomeit called the meeting to order at 9:07 a.m.
Chairman's Report
At 9:08 a.m., the Chairman provided his report. The Chairman discussed a
proposal to appoint him as a member of certain subcommittees which may help
establish a quorum for the meetings to proceed.
At 9:11 a.m., Mr. Poulin moved, seconded by Ms. Nolen, to amend the agenda to
add as Item 21, Commission Acceptance of the Connecticut Employees Retirement
System GASB 67 & GASB 68 reporting as of June 30, 2018 and the Connecticut
Judges, Family Support Magistrates and Compensation Commissioners Retirement
System prepared as of June 30, 2018. The Chairman asked if there was any
discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote. The Commission voted
unanimously in favor to amend the agenda as described.
Division Director's Report
At 9:11 a.m., Mr. Herrington provided the Division Director�s Report. The
Division Director advised that the Retirement Services Division is working with
the vendor to implement the provisions of the SEBAC Agreement requiring
disability retirees to apply for social security disability benefits.
Additionally, the Division is working with Commission Tax Counsel on reviewing
the Tier IV Summary Plan Description.
Division Director's Report
Disability Retirements
Number of Applications Received |
22 |
13 |
16 |
21 |
Number of Applications on the Agenda |
27 |
24 |
25 |
27 |
Number of Application Approved |
20 |
13 |
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
24-Month Review Cases |
On the list for 24-Month Review (Past and Future) |
228 |
242 |
256 |
251 |
Collecting SSD |
62 |
63 |
63 |
83 |
Part of the Backlog |
1 |
19 |
24 |
41 |
Not Collecting SSD |
166 |
179 |
193 |
168 |
Part of the Backlog |
78 |
98 |
99 |
90 |
MEB Scheduled |
29 |
27 |
41 |
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
Retirements in Audit |
|
|
|
Retirements Processed |
116 |
134 |
210 |
225 |
Regular |
89 |
102 |
184 |
191 |
Voluntary Pending |
9 |
11 |
9 |
7 |
New Disability |
8 |
6 |
9 |
10 |
Disability Finalized |
10 |
15 |
8 |
17 |
New Matters
- 1. Request Commission Approval of the January
17, 2019 minutes.
-
i. At 9:18 a.m., Mr.
Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to approve the January 17, 2019
minutes.
-
ii. Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote.
-
iii. The Commission
voted unanimously in favor to approve the January 17, 2019 minutes.
- 2. Request Commission Approval of the State Employees
Retirement Commission Chairman�s Per Diem Expenses
-
i. At 9:18 a.m., Mr.
Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to approve the State Employees Retirement
Commission Chairman�s Per Diem Expenses.
ii. Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote.
iii. The Commission voted
unanimously in favor to approve the State Employees Retirement Commission
Chairman�s Per Diem Expenses.
- 3. Request Commission Approval of the State Employees
Retirement Commission Union Trustee Claude Poulin Per Diem and Travel Expenses.
-
i. At 9:18 a.m., Mr.
Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to approve the State Employees Retirement
Commission Union Trustee�s Per Diem and Travel Expenses.
ii. Mr. Poulin abstained.
iii. Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote.
- iv. The Commission voted
unanimously in favor, with Mr. Poulin abstaining, to approve the State Employees
Retirement Commission Union Trustee�s Claude Poulin Per Diem and Travel
Expenses.
4. Request Commission Acceptance of the January 2019
Billing from Robinson and Cole for Federal Tax Matters.
-
i. At 9:19 a.m., Mr.
Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to accept the January 2019 billing from
Robinson and Cole for Federal Tax Matters.
ii. Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote.
iii. The Commission voted
unanimously in favor to accept the January 2019 billing from Robinson and Cole
for Federal Tax Matters.
5. Request Commission Acceptance of the January 2019
Billing from Robinson and Cole for CMERS.
-
i. At 9:19 a.m., Mr.
Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to accept the January 2019 billing from
Robinson and Cole for CMERS.
-
ii. Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote.
-
iii. The Commission voted
unanimously in favor to accept the January 2019 billing from Robinson and Cole
for CMERS.
- 6. Request Commission Acceptance of Invoices from
Rose Kallor rendered for the month of January.
- i. At 9:19 a.m., Mr.
Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to accept the invoices from Rose Kallor
rendered for the month of January.
- ii. Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote.
- iii. The Commission voted
unanimously in favor to accept the invoices from Rose Kallor rendered for the
month of January.
- 7. Request Commission Approval of the Connecticut
State Employees Retirement System Service Retirements for the Month of January
2019.
-
i. At 9:19 a.m., Mr.
Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to approve the Connecticut State Employees
Retirement System Service Retirements for the Month of January 2019
ii. Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote.
iii. The Commission voted
unanimously in favor to approve the Connecticut State Employees Retirement
System Service Retirements for the Month of January 2019.
- 8. Request Commission Approval of the Connecticut
State Employees Retirement System Voluntary Pending Retirements for the Month of
January 2019.
-
i. At 9:19 a.m., Mr.
Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to approve the Connecticut State Employees
Retirement System Voluntary Pending Retirements for the Month of January 2019.
-
ii. Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote.
-
iii. The Commission voted
unanimously in favor to approve the Connecticut State Employees Retirement
System Voluntary Pending Retirements for the Month of January 2019.
- 9. Request Commission Approval of the Connecticut
State Employees System Disability Retirements for the Month of January 2019.
-
i. At 9:19 a.m., Mr.
Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to approve the Connecticut State Employees
System Disability Retirements for the Month of January 2019.
-
ii. Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote.
-
iii. The Commission voted
unanimously in favor to approve the Connecticut State Employees System
Disability Retirements for the Month of January 2019.
- 10. Request Commission Approval of the Connecticut State Employees
System Retroactive Retirements for the Month of January 2019.
-
i. At 9:19 a.m., Mr.
Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to approve the Connecticut State Employees
System Retroactive Retirements for the Month of January 2019.
-
ii. Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote.
-
iii. The Commission voted
unanimously in favor to approve the Connecticut State Employees System
Retroactive Retirements for the Month of January 2019.
- 11. Request Commission Approval of the Municipal Retirement System
Retirements for the Month of January 2019.
-
i. At 9:19 a.m., Mr.
Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to approve the Municipal Retirement System
Retirements for the Month of January 2019.
-
ii. Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote.
-
iii. The Commission voted
unanimously in favor to approve the Municipal Retirement System Retirements for
the month of January 2019.
- 12. Request Commission Approval of the Municipal Retirement System
Disability Retirements Approved by the Medical Examining Board.
-
i. At 9:19 a.m., Mr.
Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to approve the Municipal Retirement System
Disability Retirements Approved by the Medical Examining Board.
-
ii. Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote.
-
iii. The Commission voted
unanimously in favor to approve the Municipal Retirement System Disability
Retirements Approved by the Medical Examining Board.
- 13. Request Commission Approval of the Municipal Retirement System
Disability Retirements Denied by the Medical Examining Board.
- i. At 9:19 a.m., Mr.
Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to approve the Municipal Retirement System
Disability Retirements Denied by the Medical Examining Board.
- ii. Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote.
- iii. The Commission voted
unanimously in favor to approve the Municipal Retirement System Disability
Retirements Denied by the Medical Examining Board.
- 14. Request Commission Acceptance of the Recommendations by the Medical
Examining Board for the Continued Entitlement Denials.
-
i. At 9:22 a.m., Mr.
Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to accept the recommendations by the
Medical Examining Board for the Continued Entitlement Denials.
-
ii. Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There was a brief discussion. Mr. Carey inquired
with respect to the procedure and status of the matter as it relates to the
Medical Examining Board tabling Mr. Daniel Callaghan�s continued entitlement
review. Mr. Newman advised as to the same.
- iii. The Commission voted
unanimously in favor to accept the recommendations by the Medical Examining
Board for the Continued Entitlement Denials.
- 15. Request Commission Acceptance of the Recommendations by the Medical
Examining Board for the Continued Entitlement Approvals.
-
i. At 9:23 a.m., Mr.
Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to accept the recommendations by the
Medical Examining Board for the Continued Entitlement Approvals.
-
ii. Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote.
- iii. The Commission voted
unanimously in favor to accept the recommendations by the Medical Examining
Board for the Continued Entitlement Approvals.
- 16. Request Commission Approval of the Retirement Services Division
Request to Abandon the Disability Applications Due to Failure to Provide the
Proper Documentation in the Time Allotted.
-
i. At 9:23 a.m., Mr.
Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to approve the Retirement Services
Division Request to Abandon the Disability Applications Due to Failure to
Provide the Proper Documentation in the Time Allotted.
-
ii. Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote.
-
iii. The Commission voted
unanimously in favor to approve the Retirement Services Division Request to
Abandon the Disability Applications Due to Failure to Provide the Proper
Documentation in the Time Allotted.
- 17. Request Commission Approval of the Connecticut Probate, Judges and
Employees Retirement System.
-
i. At 9:23 a.m., Mr.
Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to approve the Connecticut Probate Judges
and Employees Retirement System.
-
ii. Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote.
-
iii. The Commission voted
unanimously to approve the Connecticut Probate Judges and Employees Retirement
System.
- 18. Request Commission Approval of the Probate Judges and Employees
Retirement Fund Personnel Expenses for the Pay Period December 7, 2018 Through
January 3, 2019.
-
i. At 9:23 a.m., Mr.
Luciano moved, seconded by Quiros to approve the Probate Judges and Employees
Retirement Fund Personnel Expenses for the Pay Period December 7, 2018 Through
January 3, 2019.
-
ii. Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote.
-
iii. The Commission voted
unanimously in favor to approve the Probate Judges and Employees Retirement Fund
Personnel Expenses for the Pay Period December 7, 2018 Through January 3, 2019.
- 21. Commission Acceptance of CMERS and judges/commissioners/magistrate GASB
67/68 reports.
-
i. At 9:23 a.m., Mr.
Poulin moved, seconded by Quiros to accept the CMERS and
judges/commissioners/magistrate GASB 67/68 reports.
ii. Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote.
iii. The Commission voted
unanimously in favor to accept the CMERS and judges/commissioners/magistrate
GASB 67/68 reports.
19. A Petition for Declaratory Ruling has been made in Connection with
the Retirement Commission�s February 15, 2018 Adoption of the Medical Examining
Board�s Recommendation to Deny Jeremy Wiganowske�s Continued Entitlement to a
Service Connected Disability Retirement. (Appearance is scheduled at 9:30 a.m.)
i. At 9:25 a.m., Ms.
Winona Zimberlin appeared on behalf of Mr. Jeremy Wiganowske.
ii. Attorney Cieslak
clarified that Attorney Zimberlin was here in connection with Mr. Wiganowske�s
claim for payment of benefits between 2012 and 2017, and that the continued
entitlement review was before the Medical Examining Board on Mr. Wiganowske�s
request for reconsideration.
iii. Attorney Zimberlin
presented Mr. Wiganowske�s claim for payment of benefits to the Commission.
The trustees and Attorney Cieslak asked some questions to which Attorney
Zimberlin responded.
iv. The matter was taken
under advisement.
20. A Petition for Declaratory Ruling has been made in Connection with
the Retirement Commission�s January 15, 2016 Adoption of the Medical Examining
Board�s Recommendation to Deny William Dietrich�s Application for a Service
Connected Disability Retirement. (Appearance at 10:00 a.m.)
i. At 9:36 a.m., Ms.
Winona Zimberlin appeared on behalf of Mr. William Dietrich. Attorney Zimberlin
presented Mr. Dietrich�s claim as it relates to the Medical Examining Board�s
denial of a service connected disability retirement and whether the injury
received by Mr. Dietrich was service connected. The trustees and Attorney
Cieslak asked some questions to which Attorney Zimberlin responded.
ii. The matter was taken
under advisement.
Executive Session - Discussion and Possible Action
- Jeremy Wiganowske - pending claim/written legal opinion.
- William Dietrich -
pending claim/written legal opinion.
- Catherine Crandle - pending litigation.
- Town of Thompson - pending litigation.
- Ronald Johnson - pending litigation.
- James Rizzio - pending litigation.
- David Carter - pending litigation.
- Richard
Kay - pending litigation.
- Carol Walenski - pending litigation.
- Gary Soracchi -
pending litigation.
- Summary plan descriptions update - written legal opinion.
At 9:41 a.m., Mr. McLellan moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to suspend the
regular meeting and go into executive session for the purposes of discussing
Item 1. Attorney Barth, Attorney Cieslak, John Herrington, Colin Newman,
Attorney Rose and Attorney Sullivan were invited by the Commission to stay for
executive session. The Chairman asked if there was any discussion. There being
no discussion he called for a vote. The Commission voted unanimously in favor to
enter executive session to discuss Item 1.
A fifteen minute break was taken in order to allow the court reporter to pack
up his equipment and exit the meeting.
At 10:02 a.m., Mr. Coffey moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to exit executive
session. The Chairman asked if there was any discussion. There being no
discussion he called for a vote. The Commission voted unanimously to exit
executive session.
At 10:02 a.m., Mr. Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to go into executive
session for purposes of discussing Item 2. Attorney Barth, Attorney
Cieslak, John Herrington, Colin Newman, Attorney Rose and Attorney Sullivan were
invited by the Commission to stay for executive session. The Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote. The
Commission voted unanimously in favor to enter executive session to discuss Item
2.
At 10:16 a.m., Mr. Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to exit executive
session. The Chairman asked if there was any discussion. There being no
discussion he called for a vote. The Commission voted unanimously to exit
executive session.
At 10:16 a.m., Mr. Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to go into executive
session for purposes of discussing Item 3. Attorney Barth, Attorney
Cieslak, John Herrington, Colin Newman, Attorney Rose and Attorney Sullivan were
invited by the Commission to stay for executive session. The Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote. The
Commission voted unanimously in favor to enter executive session to discuss Item
3.
At 10:17 a.m., Mr. Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to exit executive
session. The Chairman asked if there was any discussion. There being no
discussion he called for a vote. The Commission voted unanimously to exit
executive session.
At 10:17 a.m., Mr. Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to go into executive
session for purposes of discussing Item 4. Attorney Barth, Attorney
Cieslak, John Herrington, Colin Newman, Attorney Rose and Attorney Sullivan were
invited by the Commission to stay for executive session. The Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote. The
Commission voted unanimously in favor to enter executive session to discuss Item
4.
At 10:18 a.m., Mr. Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to exit executive
session. The Chairman asked if there was any discussion. There being no
discussion he called for a vote. The Commission voted unanimously to exit
executive session.
At 10:18 a.m., Mr. Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to go into executive
session for purposes of discussing Item 5. Attorney Barth, Attorney
Cieslak, John Herrington, Colin Newman, Attorney Rose and Attorney Sullivan were
invited by the Commission to stay for executive session. The Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote. The
Commission voted unanimously in favor to enter executive session to discuss Item
5.
At 10:21 a.m., Mr. Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to exit executive
session. The Chairman asked if there was any discussion. There being no
discussion he called for a vote. The Commission voted unanimously to exit
executive session.
At 10:21 a.m., Mr. Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to go into executive
session for purposes of discussing Item 6. Attorney Barth, Attorney
Cieslak, John Herrington, Colin Newman, Attorney Rose and Attorney Sullivan were
invited by the Commission to stay for executive session. The Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote. The
Commission voted unanimously in favor to enter executive session to discuss Item
6.
At 10:22 a.m., Mr. Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to exit executive
session. The Chairman asked if there was any discussion. There being no
discussion he called for a vote. The Commission voted unanimously to exit
executive session.
At 10:22 a.m., Mr. Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to go into executive
session for purposes of discussing Item 7. Attorney Barth, Attorney
Cieslak, John Herrington, Colin Newman, Attorney Rose and Attorney Sullivan were
invited by the Commission to stay for executive session. The Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote. The
Commission voted unanimously in favor to enter executive session to discuss Item
7.
At 10:22 a.m., Mr. Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to exit executive
session. The Chairman asked if there was any discussion. There being no
discussion he called for a vote. The Commission voted unanimously to exit
executive session.
At 10:22 a.m., Mr. Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to go into executive
session for purposes of discussing Item 8. Attorney Barth, Attorney
Cieslak, John Herrington, Colin Newman, Attorney Rose and Attorney Sullivan were
invited by the Commission to stay for executive session. The Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote. The
Commission voted unanimously in favor to enter executive session to discuss Item
8.
At 10:23 a.m., Mr. Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to exit executive
session. The Chairman asked if there was any discussion. There being no
discussion he called for a vote. The Commission voted unanimously to exit
executive session.
At 10:23 a.m., Mr. Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to go into executive
session for purposes of discussing Item 9. Attorney Barth, Attorney
Cieslak, John Herrington, Colin Newman, Attorney Rose and Attorney Sullivan were
invited by the Commission to stay for executive session. The Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote. The
Commission voted unanimously in favor to enter executive session to discuss Item
9.
At 10:25 a.m., Mr. Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to exit executive
session. The Chairman asked if there was any discussion. There being no
discussion he called for a vote. The Commission voted unanimously to exit
executive session.
At 10:25 a.m., Mr. Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to go into executive
session for purposes of discussing Item 10. Attorney Barth, Attorney
Cieslak, John Herrington, Colin Newman, Attorney Rose and Attorney Sullivan were
invited by the Commission to stay for executive session. The Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote. The
Commission voted unanimously in favor to enter executive session to discuss Item
10.
At 10:25 a.m., Mr. Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to exit executive
session. The Chairman asked if there was any discussion. There being no
discussion he called for a vote. The Commission voted unanimously to exit
executive session.
At 10:25 a.m., Mr. Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to go into executive
session for purposes of discussing Item 11. Attorney Barth, Attorney
Cieslak, John Herrington, Colin Newman, Attorney Rose and Attorney Sullivan were
invited by the Commission to stay for executive session. The Chairman asked if
there was any discussion. There being no discussion he called for a vote. The
Commission voted unanimously in favor to enter executive session to discuss Item
11.
At 10:28 a.m., Mr. Luciano moved, seconded by Mr. Quiros to exit executive
session. The Chairman asked if there was any discussion. There being no
discussion he called for a vote. The Commission voted unanimously to exit
executive session.
No motions were made regarding the items discussed in executive session.
Adjournment
With no further business before the Commission, Mr. Luciano moved, seconded
by Mr. Quiros to adjourn at 10:28 a.m. The Commission voted unanimously to
adjourn.
Submitted by:
__________________________________
Peter Adomeit, Chairman
___________________________________
Prepared by John Herrington
Director Retirement Service Division
Return to Meetings, Agendas and Minutes Home Page
Return to Comptroller's Home Page